justAnotherFile
09-05 03:25 PM
My birth certificate issued by the city municipality in India does not carry my name. Is a affidavit required in such a case? Has anyone been through this before? Also can you post an sample affidavit if you have one.
thx
thx
wallpaper Bugatti+veyron+price+in+
navyug
02-06 03:20 PM
Nebraska will deny 140 for commerse degrees. They purely base their approval on education not on work experience. I guess they also know that people fake their experience but cannot fake the education. This is a sad state of affairs but I guess our country men are also partially responsible.
gcseeker2002
12-26 04:16 PM
search for woodlands or ranjith or palmgrove in google, dont worry about autos in chennai, they are big time cheats, they will rip apart 50 Rs per ride from anywhere minimum.
2011 Bugatti Veyron Grand Sport
realist
01-07 09:00 AM
In a move certain to escalate the legal tug of war over illegal immigration, state lawmakers from across the country announced Wednesday that they are launching an effort to deny automatic citizenship to the U.S.-born children of undocumented immigrants.
Republicans from Pennsylvania, Arizona, Oklahoma, Georgia, South Carolina and other states said they were taking aim at birthright citizenship by seeking to apply the Constitution's 14th Amendment - which grants citizenship to all children born in the United States - only to children with at least one parent who is a permanent resident or citizen.
Within weeks, several state legislatures are expected to introduce bills that would lay the groundwork for such a reinterpretation of the 14th Amendment, which was passed in the wake of the Civil War in order to confer citizenship on freed African American slaves.
Proponents said their strategy is designed to draw legal challenges and get the issue before the Supreme Court.
Civil rights groups denounced the move and said it was motivated by racism against Latino immigrants. They also said that Supreme Court precedents have made clear for more than a century that the 14th Amendment applies to all children born in the United States, regardless of whether their parents were in the country legally.
About 340,000 children were born in the United States to undocumented immigrants in 2008, according to a study released in August by the Pew Hispanic Center. Thousands of children born to tourists and foreign students also could be denied citizenship if the 14th Amendment were reinterpreted.
The move is the latest example of states testing the boundaries of federal control over immigration. "This country has a malady, and it is costing her citizens dearly," said South Carolina State Sen. Danny Verdin (R). He added that the rise in number of what he called "anchor babies" - children born in the United States to undocumented immigrants - had created a huge problem.
Pennsylvania State Rep. Daryl Metcalfe (R) said that he was planning to introduce legislation within weeks and that legislators in about 40 states, including Virginia, had signed up to learn more about the proposal. Metcalfe said he expected about 20 states to introduce legislation soon, among them Pennsylvania, Arizona, Nebraska, Alabama, Delaware, Idaho, Indiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Montana, New Hampshire, Oklahoma, Texas and Utah.
Corey Stewart, chairman of the Prince William County Board of County Supervisors, who has been pushing for Arizona-type legislation in Virginia, said he is disappointed that Virginia is not in the vanguard of the push to end birthright citizenship.
"It has been so difficult to get bold action," he said.
In Maryland, Del. Patrick L. McDonough (R-Baltimore County), the legislature's most outspoken critic of illegal immigration, said it is possible he may introduce birthright legislation. But it is unlikely to advance very far in a state controlled by Democrats.
"It's hard to imagine a more quintessentially anti-American proposal than one that would judge a person by their parents or grandparents or great-grandparents," said Lucas Guttentag, who directs the Immigrant Rights Project at the American Civil Liberties Union. Guttentag said that the ACLU would counter any effort to challenge the 14th Amendment.
Proponents of the new strategy said they would adopt a two-pronged approach. The first is to introduce bills in state legislatures that revive the concept of "state citizenship." Only children with at least one parent who is a U.S. permanent resident or citizen would be granted state citizenship, though it wouldn't prevent the federal government from granting U.S. citizenship to the children of undocumented immigrants.
The second prong of the strategy involves a more direct challenge to the authority of the federal government by using what is known as a state compact to draw a distinction between the children of undocumented immigrants and those of legal permanent residents and U.S. citizens.
A compact is a legal term that describes a measure, passed by states, that requires congressional approval. If Congress approves a state compact, it can become federal law without requiring the signature of the president, said Kris Kobach, professor of law at the University of Missouri at Kansas City and the Kansas secretary of state-elect.
The states involved in the compact would issue different birth certificates to children of permanent residents and U.S. citizens from those of undocumented immigrants, tourists and foreign students. The birth certificates would draw a distinction between those children whose parents are "subject to the jurisdiction of the United States" - a phrase from the 14th Amendment - and other children whose parents are not.
Kobach and other proponents said that because undocumented immigrants are in the country illegally, they are not under the jurisdiction of the United States.
Effectively, states would be throwing down the gauntlet to Congress to deny citizenship to children who do not have at least one parent who is a permanent resident or a citizen.
Walter Dellinger, who was assistant attorney general and acting solicitor general in President Bill Clinton's administration, predicted that the Supreme Court would dismiss the challenge to the 14th Amendment because of past decisions that ruled children born in the United States were citizens.
In 1898, the Supreme Court ruled that children born to Chinese migrants - who were themselves barred by exclusionary racial laws from becoming citizens - were U.S. citizens since they were born on U.S. soil.
The clause in the 14th Amendment that restricted birthright citizenship to those "under the jurisdiction of the United States," he added, merely excluded the children of foreign diplomats from becoming citizens.
Repeated challenges to the 14th Amendment, several civil rights experts said, had questioned the legitimacy of African American, Chinese American and Japanese American citizens. Each time, the challenge was refuted.
"This matter has been raised in every instance in a racial context," Dellinger said. "That's why we wanted a simple rule: Every new girl or boy born in this country is simply, indisputably, an American."
--Washington Post
Republicans from Pennsylvania, Arizona, Oklahoma, Georgia, South Carolina and other states said they were taking aim at birthright citizenship by seeking to apply the Constitution's 14th Amendment - which grants citizenship to all children born in the United States - only to children with at least one parent who is a permanent resident or citizen.
Within weeks, several state legislatures are expected to introduce bills that would lay the groundwork for such a reinterpretation of the 14th Amendment, which was passed in the wake of the Civil War in order to confer citizenship on freed African American slaves.
Proponents said their strategy is designed to draw legal challenges and get the issue before the Supreme Court.
Civil rights groups denounced the move and said it was motivated by racism against Latino immigrants. They also said that Supreme Court precedents have made clear for more than a century that the 14th Amendment applies to all children born in the United States, regardless of whether their parents were in the country legally.
About 340,000 children were born in the United States to undocumented immigrants in 2008, according to a study released in August by the Pew Hispanic Center. Thousands of children born to tourists and foreign students also could be denied citizenship if the 14th Amendment were reinterpreted.
The move is the latest example of states testing the boundaries of federal control over immigration. "This country has a malady, and it is costing her citizens dearly," said South Carolina State Sen. Danny Verdin (R). He added that the rise in number of what he called "anchor babies" - children born in the United States to undocumented immigrants - had created a huge problem.
Pennsylvania State Rep. Daryl Metcalfe (R) said that he was planning to introduce legislation within weeks and that legislators in about 40 states, including Virginia, had signed up to learn more about the proposal. Metcalfe said he expected about 20 states to introduce legislation soon, among them Pennsylvania, Arizona, Nebraska, Alabama, Delaware, Idaho, Indiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Montana, New Hampshire, Oklahoma, Texas and Utah.
Corey Stewart, chairman of the Prince William County Board of County Supervisors, who has been pushing for Arizona-type legislation in Virginia, said he is disappointed that Virginia is not in the vanguard of the push to end birthright citizenship.
"It has been so difficult to get bold action," he said.
In Maryland, Del. Patrick L. McDonough (R-Baltimore County), the legislature's most outspoken critic of illegal immigration, said it is possible he may introduce birthright legislation. But it is unlikely to advance very far in a state controlled by Democrats.
"It's hard to imagine a more quintessentially anti-American proposal than one that would judge a person by their parents or grandparents or great-grandparents," said Lucas Guttentag, who directs the Immigrant Rights Project at the American Civil Liberties Union. Guttentag said that the ACLU would counter any effort to challenge the 14th Amendment.
Proponents of the new strategy said they would adopt a two-pronged approach. The first is to introduce bills in state legislatures that revive the concept of "state citizenship." Only children with at least one parent who is a U.S. permanent resident or citizen would be granted state citizenship, though it wouldn't prevent the federal government from granting U.S. citizenship to the children of undocumented immigrants.
The second prong of the strategy involves a more direct challenge to the authority of the federal government by using what is known as a state compact to draw a distinction between the children of undocumented immigrants and those of legal permanent residents and U.S. citizens.
A compact is a legal term that describes a measure, passed by states, that requires congressional approval. If Congress approves a state compact, it can become federal law without requiring the signature of the president, said Kris Kobach, professor of law at the University of Missouri at Kansas City and the Kansas secretary of state-elect.
The states involved in the compact would issue different birth certificates to children of permanent residents and U.S. citizens from those of undocumented immigrants, tourists and foreign students. The birth certificates would draw a distinction between those children whose parents are "subject to the jurisdiction of the United States" - a phrase from the 14th Amendment - and other children whose parents are not.
Kobach and other proponents said that because undocumented immigrants are in the country illegally, they are not under the jurisdiction of the United States.
Effectively, states would be throwing down the gauntlet to Congress to deny citizenship to children who do not have at least one parent who is a permanent resident or a citizen.
Walter Dellinger, who was assistant attorney general and acting solicitor general in President Bill Clinton's administration, predicted that the Supreme Court would dismiss the challenge to the 14th Amendment because of past decisions that ruled children born in the United States were citizens.
In 1898, the Supreme Court ruled that children born to Chinese migrants - who were themselves barred by exclusionary racial laws from becoming citizens - were U.S. citizens since they were born on U.S. soil.
The clause in the 14th Amendment that restricted birthright citizenship to those "under the jurisdiction of the United States," he added, merely excluded the children of foreign diplomats from becoming citizens.
Repeated challenges to the 14th Amendment, several civil rights experts said, had questioned the legitimacy of African American, Chinese American and Japanese American citizens. Each time, the challenge was refuted.
"This matter has been raised in every instance in a racial context," Dellinger said. "That's why we wanted a simple rule: Every new girl or boy born in this country is simply, indisputably, an American."
--Washington Post
more...
lazycis
12-21 07:23 PM
Today, my attorney replied to MTD. How much time the judge take after this to Deny/grant MTD?
Regards
There is no set time for this. It could be from two weeks to 6 months or more. Depends on a judge
Regards
There is no set time for this. It could be from two weeks to 6 months or more. Depends on a judge
bharol
07-10 08:40 PM
Previous congress was called "Do nothing" congress...
This one is "DO ABSOLUTELY NOTHING" congress.
This one is "DO ABSOLUTELY NOTHING" congress.
more...
heywhat
11-04 01:14 PM
I was in almost same situation with H1 and H4 transfer, as per attorney.. you do not need to transfer H4 whenver you do H1b transfer ... It's normally done to keep end/expiry date on H1b and H4 same ..
Your wife is in Status as long as you are in Status and her I-94 is valid.
Your wife is in Status as long as you are in Status and her I-94 is valid.
2010 How Much Does A Bugatti Veyron
myimmiv
07-13 11:50 AM
Category: EB3
PD: May 2005
PD: May 2005
more...
murbh
09-28 09:14 PM
(*based on data from USCIS)
Result for murbh:
Your position is 163 in the Green Card Queue based on your Country of Chargeability "", Priority Date "Mar-05" and Category "EB2" .
Your Expected Date of Adjudication is Sep, 2009.
(*based on data from USCIS website September 2009)
Result for murbh:
Your position is 596 in the Green Card Queue based on your Country of Chargeability "", Priority Date "Mar-05" and Category "EB2" .
Your Expected Date of Adjudication is Sep, 2009.
Result for murbh:
Your position is 163 in the Green Card Queue based on your Country of Chargeability "", Priority Date "Mar-05" and Category "EB2" .
Your Expected Date of Adjudication is Sep, 2009.
(*based on data from USCIS website September 2009)
Result for murbh:
Your position is 596 in the Green Card Queue based on your Country of Chargeability "", Priority Date "Mar-05" and Category "EB2" .
Your Expected Date of Adjudication is Sep, 2009.
hair Bugatti Veyron Price, Specs
omeya
03-20 10:28 AM
you can do it yourself online E-filing, no need to pay that layers fees,
i applyed mines last month online to TSC center, and mailed all documents to the E-filing
center, 4 weeks passed and no mail to go for finger printing i was worried to hell what is going to happen , to my great suprised i got my renwed EAD in the mail in 40 days
so do it yourself & all the best
Hi Rajs,
What documents did you mail? I hear from other people that you don't need to mail any documents? Did you do Fedex or via regular mail?
Thanks,
Omeya
i applyed mines last month online to TSC center, and mailed all documents to the E-filing
center, 4 weeks passed and no mail to go for finger printing i was worried to hell what is going to happen , to my great suprised i got my renwed EAD in the mail in 40 days
so do it yourself & all the best
Hi Rajs,
What documents did you mail? I hear from other people that you don't need to mail any documents? Did you do Fedex or via regular mail?
Thanks,
Omeya
more...
kumarc123
04-02 03:25 PM
I strongly believe, they my use a point system approach like other countries. They talked about point system in the past, I am pretty sure thy might implement that system
What do you all think?
What do you all think?
hot a Bugatti+veyron+engine+
perm2gc
09-29 10:51 AM
Hi Perm2gc,
if you have or know about any experience please share...thanks I didnot come across any issue with your scenario but one of my friend was denied 7th year extension based on his 3yrs degree+1yr diploma.
if you have or know about any experience please share...thanks I didnot come across any issue with your scenario but one of my friend was denied 7th year extension based on his 3yrs degree+1yr diploma.
more...
house You know the Bugatti Veyron
wandmaker
10-01 10:17 PM
Thanks for doing this again.
You are welcome - We meet again in the funding thread :)
You are welcome - We meet again in the funding thread :)
tattoo The special edition Bugatti
baburob2
04-25 09:42 AM
Harry Pollzer, Georgia State Professor
"Increasing the cap on GC for H1B program by increasing the fees and then investing the fees to increase trade" and Dianne Feinstein acknowledges it.
"Increasing the cap on GC for H1B program by increasing the fees and then investing the fees to increase trade" and Dianne Feinstein acknowledges it.
more...
pictures The Bugatti Veyron 16.4 is the
krish2006
09-30 01:13 PM
Hey there,
I'm going through all that right now. I went to the Driver's License place last Wednesday and it was a pretty bad experience.
My license expires on 10/6 and my EAD on 11/5. But I already received my new EAD that expires on Nov 2012, so I was hoping that they would give me a new license good until Nov 2012 instead of 11/5/10.
So I hand both EAD cards to the woman behind the counter and she tells me they can't use the newer card because it's doesn't start until 11/5, which is ridiculous... so she tells me that I have to use my current, soon to expire EAD and then they will give me a license valid til 11/5. Then I would have to go and renew again using my new EAD. SO annoying. So she tells me to sit down that they are running my name on the computer. After a while she leaves the counter and tells me some other woman will call my name shortly.
After 20 minutes, this new lady calls my name and I have to go through the whole explanation again, and she ends up telling me that I should wait til 11/5 to renew my license. So I ask her, what am I supposed to do between 10/6 (my license exp date) and 11/5? She tells me she doesn't know, to just wait! I ask her if I"m supposed to be driving ilegally to go to work and she tells me she's not saying that I should drive. At that point I'm very upset and I tell her that there must be someone in that building that would know what to do with my case and she says she's the manager!!! Then she says that if she enters my new EAD on the System, that it would be rejected and that I would have to wait 30 days to try to reapply (???). So I told her to run my current EAD instead and she told me the system couldn't validate it either (ARGH!). Obviously, she wouldnt know (or tell me) why neither EAD cards would verify on the computer and gave me a SAVE paper telling me to come back and check again in a week.
So in a couple of days I'll be going back and see how it all continues.
VERY FRUSTRATING.
Sorry for the long post.
fixxer,
Did you call DMV? Did they give you any updates reg. SAVE verification of your EAD?
I'm going through all that right now. I went to the Driver's License place last Wednesday and it was a pretty bad experience.
My license expires on 10/6 and my EAD on 11/5. But I already received my new EAD that expires on Nov 2012, so I was hoping that they would give me a new license good until Nov 2012 instead of 11/5/10.
So I hand both EAD cards to the woman behind the counter and she tells me they can't use the newer card because it's doesn't start until 11/5, which is ridiculous... so she tells me that I have to use my current, soon to expire EAD and then they will give me a license valid til 11/5. Then I would have to go and renew again using my new EAD. SO annoying. So she tells me to sit down that they are running my name on the computer. After a while she leaves the counter and tells me some other woman will call my name shortly.
After 20 minutes, this new lady calls my name and I have to go through the whole explanation again, and she ends up telling me that I should wait til 11/5 to renew my license. So I ask her, what am I supposed to do between 10/6 (my license exp date) and 11/5? She tells me she doesn't know, to just wait! I ask her if I"m supposed to be driving ilegally to go to work and she tells me she's not saying that I should drive. At that point I'm very upset and I tell her that there must be someone in that building that would know what to do with my case and she says she's the manager!!! Then she says that if she enters my new EAD on the System, that it would be rejected and that I would have to wait 30 days to try to reapply (???). So I told her to run my current EAD instead and she told me the system couldn't validate it either (ARGH!). Obviously, she wouldnt know (or tell me) why neither EAD cards would verify on the computer and gave me a SAVE paper telling me to come back and check again in a week.
So in a couple of days I'll be going back and see how it all continues.
VERY FRUSTRATING.
Sorry for the long post.
fixxer,
Did you call DMV? Did they give you any updates reg. SAVE verification of your EAD?
dresses 2009 Bugatti Veyron Sang Bleu
lskreddy
05-16 11:19 AM
If you plan to mail the documents, be careful to read the instructions. I just applied my passport to Houston CGI and misread the instructions saying it would take 10 days. It takes 10 days if you got your passport from the local Indian consulate in US but if it was issued by Regional Passport Office in India, it would take six weeks.
They have something similar to Tatkal where you can pay 90 dollars and get it faster. How faster, don't know.
Once you have submitted your application, you are at their mercy and Houston seems to be worse than Indian regional passport offices. Their phones are constantly engaged and they barely respect you when one calls them. You have no way to upgrade.
If you have the time and proximal to an Indian Consulate, I would try going in personally and get the work done.
They have something similar to Tatkal where you can pay 90 dollars and get it faster. How faster, don't know.
Once you have submitted your application, you are at their mercy and Houston seems to be worse than Indian regional passport offices. Their phones are constantly engaged and they barely respect you when one calls them. You have no way to upgrade.
If you have the time and proximal to an Indian Consulate, I would try going in personally and get the work done.
more...
makeup Bugatti Veyron 16.4 Grand
gauravbajaj
03-13 05:43 PM
Friends,
I would like to get your advice on options I have. Here is the situation. My Passport was expiring on 25th Feb 2008 when I entered USA last year. My I-94 was stamped till Passport expiration. I have valid visa till Dec 09. I got a new passport from Chicago. My company has applied for I94 extension (even though I had valid Petition and visa) in Jan 08. I got a query on my application.
My Valid visa is on my expired passport
1) Is it safe to go to nearest CBP now and take a chance if they can extend my I94..will there be any complication in it?
2) Can I apply for Canadian Visa go out of USA and re-enter..will I get new I-94? What will happen to my I-94 application which has already been applied and there is a pending query?
3) Shall I go to Indian and come back?
Thanks for the guidance
Gaurav
I would like to get your advice on options I have. Here is the situation. My Passport was expiring on 25th Feb 2008 when I entered USA last year. My I-94 was stamped till Passport expiration. I have valid visa till Dec 09. I got a new passport from Chicago. My company has applied for I94 extension (even though I had valid Petition and visa) in Jan 08. I got a query on my application.
My Valid visa is on my expired passport
1) Is it safe to go to nearest CBP now and take a chance if they can extend my I94..will there be any complication in it?
2) Can I apply for Canadian Visa go out of USA and re-enter..will I get new I-94? What will happen to my I-94 application which has already been applied and there is a pending query?
3) Shall I go to Indian and come back?
Thanks for the guidance
Gaurav
girlfriend Mansory Bugatti Veyron Vincero
sriramkalyan
04-02 03:45 PM
Legals have to reapply Green card through Point system. And they have to go back to their countries for applying.
Now Illegals ..Its all WIN-WIN ... 12 million Voters. This is much better plan than Karl Rove had for permanent Republican majority.
You make good points but, I don't think we will be left out. The general consensus among the American public is that (given the economy is OK) legal immigration is good, illegal is bad. Americans are smart and reasonable, if it is a win-win for all, with the U.S. needing to be the key winner above all. Emotions and politics aside, we have truth on our side, and that truth is that our contributions help the U.S. be a winner. I think we will be fine!
Now Illegals ..Its all WIN-WIN ... 12 million Voters. This is much better plan than Karl Rove had for permanent Republican majority.
You make good points but, I don't think we will be left out. The general consensus among the American public is that (given the economy is OK) legal immigration is good, illegal is bad. Americans are smart and reasonable, if it is a win-win for all, with the U.S. needing to be the key winner above all. Emotions and politics aside, we have truth on our side, and that truth is that our contributions help the U.S. be a winner. I think we will be fine!
hairstyles The new Bugatti Veyron comes
karan2004m
06-24 04:40 PM
None
needhelp!
01-15 02:38 PM
I can see it.
Thanks, did that (which re-positioned the banner), but I still can't see the banner, can you??
http://what-does-it-take-to-get-thegreencard.blogspot.com/
Thanks, did that (which re-positioned the banner), but I still can't see the banner, can you??
http://what-does-it-take-to-get-thegreencard.blogspot.com/
maddipati1
08-23 08:53 PM
GOOD NEWS!! I THINK 485 AOS LOAD IS SHARED BY ALL FOUR SERVICE CENTERS
See the link below
https://egov.uscis.gov/cris/jsps/ptimes.jsp
It shows 485 EB AOS proc date for all four centers including VSC & CSC.
I think they are ignoring Bi-Specialization system for the Jul-Aug07 485 filers.
AND THE BEST PART, IF IM NOT WRONG, THEY ARE ORDERING THE EAD/AP CARDS IMMEDIATELY.
This person got his receipts, got a WAC # and status shows that his application is with CSC.
Originally Posted by czar_the_king
All our checks got cashed yesterday. Got the receipt numbers from the back of the checks. Surprisingly the receipt numbers start with WAC(California Service Center).
Checked online and the status says the application is with CSC.
Also says that the EAD cards for both me and my spouse were ordered today(08/23).
Does anyone have their application at CSC?
See the link below
https://egov.uscis.gov/cris/jsps/ptimes.jsp
It shows 485 EB AOS proc date for all four centers including VSC & CSC.
I think they are ignoring Bi-Specialization system for the Jul-Aug07 485 filers.
AND THE BEST PART, IF IM NOT WRONG, THEY ARE ORDERING THE EAD/AP CARDS IMMEDIATELY.
This person got his receipts, got a WAC # and status shows that his application is with CSC.
Originally Posted by czar_the_king
All our checks got cashed yesterday. Got the receipt numbers from the back of the checks. Surprisingly the receipt numbers start with WAC(California Service Center).
Checked online and the status says the application is with CSC.
Also says that the EAD cards for both me and my spouse were ordered today(08/23).
Does anyone have their application at CSC?
No comments:
Post a Comment