rorypirrie
03-10 05:07 PM
Thanks.
wallpaper live, Jesse
sumansk
07-16 12:47 PM
Chintu made a good point and also lets do a initial meeting with all the members who have shown the interest so far..Also IL group has been sending email among themselves that is in my opinoin excluding mements from other states who are interested in this rally.So lets stick to this thread so that everyone can see the discussions going on..Also can we create a thread to post the email and phone numner of all those interested so that we have info at the same place...
dgs
06-23 12:57 PM
Thanks for your responses and I hear you folks!
But in the interest of understanding the law I would like to discuss the original question further....
Also,
U.S. Department of Labor — Employment Standards Administration (ESA) — Wage and Hour Division (WHD) — Admission of Temporary H2A Workers (http://www.dol.gov/whd/regs/statutes/H1BStatuteINA212.htm)
(II) It is a violation of this clause for an employer who has filed an application under this subsection to require an alien who is the subject of a petition filed under section 214(c)(1), for which a fee is imposed under section 214(c)(9), to reimburse, or otherwise compensate, the employer for part or all of the cost of such fee. It is a violation of this clause for such an employer otherwise to accept such reimbursement or compensation from such an alien.
But it appears toothless because the fine is $1000.
-b
bobzibub - I appreciate the specific insight. But unless I misunderstood (and I would be happy to be corrected) Isn't what you are citing just about the fraud fee of $1500? That is a very specific type of fee payable on first filing. Generalizing that across any and all types of fees related to an H1B extension would not be the correct interpretation of the law.
Typical types of fees :
H1B Labor
USCIS (H1 Extension Petition)
USCIS (Premium Processing if applicable)
USCIS (Fraud fee if applicable)
Attorney fees
It appears that the labor and fraud fee is payable by the employer. But the rest (specifically on 2nd or later extension) can be payable entirely or partially by the employee.
It would be very helpful if any of the immigration lawyers who typically advertise/post here could contribute with some basic guidance.
Thanks.
But in the interest of understanding the law I would like to discuss the original question further....
Also,
U.S. Department of Labor — Employment Standards Administration (ESA) — Wage and Hour Division (WHD) — Admission of Temporary H2A Workers (http://www.dol.gov/whd/regs/statutes/H1BStatuteINA212.htm)
(II) It is a violation of this clause for an employer who has filed an application under this subsection to require an alien who is the subject of a petition filed under section 214(c)(1), for which a fee is imposed under section 214(c)(9), to reimburse, or otherwise compensate, the employer for part or all of the cost of such fee. It is a violation of this clause for such an employer otherwise to accept such reimbursement or compensation from such an alien.
But it appears toothless because the fine is $1000.
-b
bobzibub - I appreciate the specific insight. But unless I misunderstood (and I would be happy to be corrected) Isn't what you are citing just about the fraud fee of $1500? That is a very specific type of fee payable on first filing. Generalizing that across any and all types of fees related to an H1B extension would not be the correct interpretation of the law.
Typical types of fees :
H1B Labor
USCIS (H1 Extension Petition)
USCIS (Premium Processing if applicable)
USCIS (Fraud fee if applicable)
Attorney fees
It appears that the labor and fraud fee is payable by the employer. But the rest (specifically on 2nd or later extension) can be payable entirely or partially by the employee.
It would be very helpful if any of the immigration lawyers who typically advertise/post here could contribute with some basic guidance.
Thanks.
2011 Jesse Eisenberg on Zombieland
obviously
07-12 03:53 PM
I just called her office and to thank them for highlighting the problems faced by legal high skilled immigrants who add to the socio-economic strength of this country. The lady who took the call said she appreciated the call and would duly note it.
more...
braindrain
05-28 11:17 AM
Hi All
I have been following this thread closely and wan't to understand one question regarding the I-94.
At POE the immigration officer will stamp the I-94 validity till the passport expiry date or the expiry date on the I-797 A, whichever one is later.
Even if your passport I-94 is valid till passport expiry date, the I-797A date should be the date till which the person should be legally allowed to stay in the US....should'nt that be the case ????
Can some gurus pls clarify ?
Thanks
Always the latest I-94 takes precedence.
So, if u have entered the country with a I-797 with I-94 validility until 9/2009 and the officer at POE gives you I-94 with validity until 8/2008, then you are legal until 8/2008 and you should be making necessary arrangements to extend your stay beyond 8/2008.
If you get your I-797 after you have entered the country then you are legal until the validity date that came with the I-94 of your I-797.
I have been following this thread closely and wan't to understand one question regarding the I-94.
At POE the immigration officer will stamp the I-94 validity till the passport expiry date or the expiry date on the I-797 A, whichever one is later.
Even if your passport I-94 is valid till passport expiry date, the I-797A date should be the date till which the person should be legally allowed to stay in the US....should'nt that be the case ????
Can some gurus pls clarify ?
Thanks
Always the latest I-94 takes precedence.
So, if u have entered the country with a I-797 with I-94 validility until 9/2009 and the officer at POE gives you I-94 with validity until 8/2008, then you are legal until 8/2008 and you should be making necessary arrangements to extend your stay beyond 8/2008.
If you get your I-797 after you have entered the country then you are legal until the validity date that came with the I-94 of your I-797.
21stIcon
04-10 01:34 PM
Hi,
What is the fee schedule for the 8th yr extension. Somebody told me that company fee ($750 if employees are less than 25 or 1000 if more than 25) is suppose not to include. Pl. advice
Neeraj
Govt Fee for H1 -> AROUND $200
H4 -> Around $140
Lawyers can stretch you to any extend , my idiot lawyer billed me $750(h1)+$500(h4) for copy-paste from 7th year extension to 8th year extension, that is the reason all immigrant lawyers like BEC.
What is the fee schedule for the 8th yr extension. Somebody told me that company fee ($750 if employees are less than 25 or 1000 if more than 25) is suppose not to include. Pl. advice
Neeraj
Govt Fee for H1 -> AROUND $200
H4 -> Around $140
Lawyers can stretch you to any extend , my idiot lawyer billed me $750(h1)+$500(h4) for copy-paste from 7th year extension to 8th year extension, that is the reason all immigrant lawyers like BEC.
more...
dgs
06-23 01:27 PM
The simple stratightforward law is Employer has to pay for everything. I am on my 4th extension and recently had a visit from the USCIS at work and the first question the USCIS agent asked was who paid for H1b ?
Now you can definitely split hairs on which portion belongs to whom legally but I do not think that the agent would have appreciated the nitti grity.
So if you want to be perfectly safe then answer is straight forward.
Abhishek,
I understand your view point. And ideally, everyone would like it to be that way.
That said, I would like to bring it to your attention (and everyone else's) that what I am asking is for some guidance into the correct interpretation of the law (and yes we will be consulting with our attorney as well, but at times on intricate/complex issues like these, even the attorney opinions differ, mostly driven by lack of insight into a specific allowance in the law)
So, if the law doesn't mandate (probably only in specific instances like 2nd or later extension, salary higher than prevailing wage, etc.) that all costs have to be borne by the employer, then the employee sharing the costs would still be legal and "safe".
Again, Abhishek, I understand your reference to "safe" as being peace of mind in absence of knowledge about the specifics. It's just that if specific provisions or mandates in the law are known and are acted on accordingly, one would still be safe, albeit one will have to go through the hassle of due diligence. I guess it's the difference between quick, easy but safe way versus painstakingly diligent, informed and still safe way! Sometimes, the situation pushes one to do some diligence rather than having the quick and easy way out!
Now you can definitely split hairs on which portion belongs to whom legally but I do not think that the agent would have appreciated the nitti grity.
So if you want to be perfectly safe then answer is straight forward.
Abhishek,
I understand your view point. And ideally, everyone would like it to be that way.
That said, I would like to bring it to your attention (and everyone else's) that what I am asking is for some guidance into the correct interpretation of the law (and yes we will be consulting with our attorney as well, but at times on intricate/complex issues like these, even the attorney opinions differ, mostly driven by lack of insight into a specific allowance in the law)
So, if the law doesn't mandate (probably only in specific instances like 2nd or later extension, salary higher than prevailing wage, etc.) that all costs have to be borne by the employer, then the employee sharing the costs would still be legal and "safe".
Again, Abhishek, I understand your reference to "safe" as being peace of mind in absence of knowledge about the specifics. It's just that if specific provisions or mandates in the law are known and are acted on accordingly, one would still be safe, albeit one will have to go through the hassle of due diligence. I guess it's the difference between quick, easy but safe way versus painstakingly diligent, informed and still safe way! Sometimes, the situation pushes one to do some diligence rather than having the quick and easy way out!
2010 #39;Zombieland 2#39; to Be Filmed in
n8900498
07-27 08:06 PM
I signed an employment agreement stating that if I had to leave my employer before getting my Green Card that I will be liable for all the fees pertaining to the Green Card application which my employer has been paying for while I am been employed by him.
I have heard that an employer cannot hold Green Card fees over an employee. I also believe if anything, the fees owing should drop according to the length of time that the employee has worked for that employer.
I have been with my current employer for 4 years now and I wish to leave him but I do not want to pay him for the Green Card fees as I believe that should be a business expense to him.
I would just like to know what are my rights in the above case
Best Regards
I have heard that an employer cannot hold Green Card fees over an employee. I also believe if anything, the fees owing should drop according to the length of time that the employee has worked for that employer.
I have been with my current employer for 4 years now and I wish to leave him but I do not want to pay him for the Green Card fees as I believe that should be a business expense to him.
I would just like to know what are my rights in the above case
Best Regards
more...
pappu
01-07 09:46 AM
Most people probably agree with me that getting the greencard through employment is indeed a heroic feat. For most of us it is a quest in which the final destination (GC) itself is of less value. Getting a GC while playing according to every rule in the book, being a model citizen, being in the woodworks for years on end. At the end of the day it becomes a quest. Thousands of brave souls have gone through it. Its a slow, harrowing, painful journey. Right now, to me the benefits of a GC are blurred, its just a personal milestone, "DO I have it in me?".
I think most of us agree that through this arduous journey, there was one person on an H-4 visa, with you through the joys and pains. I am especially disturbed by the plight of Indian women who come on H-4 visas. The India woman has overcome quite a few things and history tells us that she has been a fighter throughout. From the Lijjat Papad ladies to Indira Nooyi, to fighter pilots. While they have overcome all this, the H-4 visa threatens to be their nemesis. You take a girl in the prime of her youth and impose the H-4 visa on her, which almost tantamounts to human rights violation.
I feel that the H4 visa be less restrictive, it should bestow the right to work, study, etc. The India woman went through all the pains to get where she is today, and all this will be lost. I know a lot of Indian women have gone through this, and most of them agree they are glad that its over.
While this may not directly reduce EB wait times, it may help make it bearable. The H4 visa, and way it has played out, one would think somebody would have talked about it.
I feel this should be easier to remedy than other bigger issues like per country quota limits, STEM, retrogression, etc.We understand the pain and in the initial years of IV, IV had made presentations to the administration for de-coupling the time on H4 visa. There was a long silence after we had pitched for it and then suddenly one fine day we came to know of a regulation that provided this relief. Interestingly even using our term- de-coupling. :)
That was the first step. However July after July 2007, most H4s got EAd and their pain was over.
If you think this is an issue, You must take a lead and gather all affected H4s on IV forum and work together in solving it. A lot of H4s are highly educated and sometimes more than their spouses and we are wasting their knowledge and skills by not involving them in IV volunteer effort. If affected H4s can volunteer their time for IV, IV can achieve a lot. I personally feel H4s can be better IV leaders than people on H1B as H4s can give more time to this organization.
Let me know if you are interested in volunteering your time, gather other affected H4s and possibly lead.
I think most of us agree that through this arduous journey, there was one person on an H-4 visa, with you through the joys and pains. I am especially disturbed by the plight of Indian women who come on H-4 visas. The India woman has overcome quite a few things and history tells us that she has been a fighter throughout. From the Lijjat Papad ladies to Indira Nooyi, to fighter pilots. While they have overcome all this, the H-4 visa threatens to be their nemesis. You take a girl in the prime of her youth and impose the H-4 visa on her, which almost tantamounts to human rights violation.
I feel that the H4 visa be less restrictive, it should bestow the right to work, study, etc. The India woman went through all the pains to get where she is today, and all this will be lost. I know a lot of Indian women have gone through this, and most of them agree they are glad that its over.
While this may not directly reduce EB wait times, it may help make it bearable. The H4 visa, and way it has played out, one would think somebody would have talked about it.
I feel this should be easier to remedy than other bigger issues like per country quota limits, STEM, retrogression, etc.We understand the pain and in the initial years of IV, IV had made presentations to the administration for de-coupling the time on H4 visa. There was a long silence after we had pitched for it and then suddenly one fine day we came to know of a regulation that provided this relief. Interestingly even using our term- de-coupling. :)
That was the first step. However July after July 2007, most H4s got EAd and their pain was over.
If you think this is an issue, You must take a lead and gather all affected H4s on IV forum and work together in solving it. A lot of H4s are highly educated and sometimes more than their spouses and we are wasting their knowledge and skills by not involving them in IV volunteer effort. If affected H4s can volunteer their time for IV, IV can achieve a lot. I personally feel H4s can be better IV leaders than people on H1B as H4s can give more time to this organization.
Let me know if you are interested in volunteering your time, gather other affected H4s and possibly lead.
hair talks Zombieland 2 and how
jnraajan
04-02 10:25 AM
So, did we all celebrate too soon? or is there still the longer EAD rule waiting to be published. Keeping my fingers crossed.
more...
tapukakababa
01-18 08:17 PM
I received an email from USCIS stating my case status to be "DENIAL NOTICE SENT".
It says,
Application Type: I485 , APPLICATION TO REGISTER PERMANENT RESIDENCE OR TO ADJUST STATUS
Current Status: Denial Notice Sent
On January 18, 2008, we mailed you a denial decision notice for this case I485 APPLICATION TO REGISTER PERMANENT RESIDENCE OR TO ADJUST STATUS. The notice explains why the denial decision was made and the options that may be available to you. If you have not received this notice within 30 days of the January 18, 2008, please call customer service at 1-800-375-5283 for further assistance.
Does anybody knowswhat is this regarding and why now, as EB2 quota is not available right now and my PD is May 2006. I also received my EAD in August 2007, and I-140 was in process. Dont know what going on. Did anybody else get the same thing?
It says,
Application Type: I485 , APPLICATION TO REGISTER PERMANENT RESIDENCE OR TO ADJUST STATUS
Current Status: Denial Notice Sent
On January 18, 2008, we mailed you a denial decision notice for this case I485 APPLICATION TO REGISTER PERMANENT RESIDENCE OR TO ADJUST STATUS. The notice explains why the denial decision was made and the options that may be available to you. If you have not received this notice within 30 days of the January 18, 2008, please call customer service at 1-800-375-5283 for further assistance.
Does anybody knowswhat is this regarding and why now, as EB2 quota is not available right now and my PD is May 2006. I also received my EAD in August 2007, and I-140 was in process. Dont know what going on. Did anybody else get the same thing?
hot Zombieland 2 - INTERVIEW
xyz2005
08-21 12:52 PM
Is it required for intitial evidence.
My attorney did not even ask for it.
As far as i have read in the forumns earlier, it is not an intital evidence.
Can some one clarify on this?
Yes I agree Akhil. This has never been asked and even I was not asked to submit it. But I think each case would be different. How much is your prevailing wage and how much do you earn, how many dependents etc. etc. So the guy needs a proof to see whether there is indeed something or not but again this is my guess....my attorney never asked me submit W2 or IRS Tax returns..! I got all the receipts as well. I am surprised that these things have been asked.
So I guess this person has no option but to submit all this to satisfy their requirements...but yes I am surprised becoz this is never asked.
Best Regards
My attorney did not even ask for it.
As far as i have read in the forumns earlier, it is not an intital evidence.
Can some one clarify on this?
Yes I agree Akhil. This has never been asked and even I was not asked to submit it. But I think each case would be different. How much is your prevailing wage and how much do you earn, how many dependents etc. etc. So the guy needs a proof to see whether there is indeed something or not but again this is my guess....my attorney never asked me submit W2 or IRS Tax returns..! I got all the receipts as well. I am surprised that these things have been asked.
So I guess this person has no option but to submit all this to satisfy their requirements...but yes I am surprised becoz this is never asked.
Best Regards
more...
house Full View Justin Bieber
senthil
11-24 09:35 PM
I second what "gcdreamer05" has mentioned above. Be patient until you get what you wanted and make your move. Tell / find valid ( or make ) reasons where your attorney cant play any more games quoting your employer regarding your I-140 Receipt#. Dont rush and make any urgent moves and jeopardize your valuable that you already have spent towards your GC journey and re-invent again. Who knows how the situation is going to be in future wrt GC process. Good luck. My2c.
tattoo Scream 4, Zombieland 2,
krishmunn
11-13 09:56 AM
"What if I do not have an invite letter from UK? "
In that case you need to show your hotel booking.
In that case you need to show your hotel booking.
more...
pictures +eisenberg+zombieland+2
gcnirvana
07-20 12:10 PM
Guys,
Trusting your lawyer is one thing but keeping upto date with government policies is different. If you read the 485 instructions, it clearly states that Employment Letter is part of the Initial Evidence and if your Initial Evidences are not part of the package then they might outrightly reject your application rather than sending RFEs. My lawyer had the same notion but I sent him and my employer the instructions in I-485 (in bold) and about the recent USCIS memo about rejecting applications without RFEs for missing initial evidences. Finally he gave in and my employer sent him the verification letter. Good luck!
Trusting your lawyer is one thing but keeping upto date with government policies is different. If you read the 485 instructions, it clearly states that Employment Letter is part of the Initial Evidence and if your Initial Evidences are not part of the package then they might outrightly reject your application rather than sending RFEs. My lawyer had the same notion but I sent him and my employer the instructions in I-485 (in bold) and about the recent USCIS memo about rejecting applications without RFEs for missing initial evidences. Finally he gave in and my employer sent him the verification letter. Good luck!
dresses cameo for Zombieland 2
kalyan
10-13 10:41 AM
My last two supervisors are still with Company (www.satyam.com). They are not ready to give the skillset letter.
But my L1B documentation has a resume and it has all the skillsets and that is submitted to USCIS.
I can show all the US Based w2 and Paystubs.
But only one manager is not with Satyam and he can provide only 2 years of experience since he worked only for 2 years or little over 2 years.
Do you think it would help. The company also sent me an email this morning that they would'nt giveme the skillset letter.
Thanks
But my L1B documentation has a resume and it has all the skillsets and that is submitted to USCIS.
I can show all the US Based w2 and Paystubs.
But only one manager is not with Satyam and he can provide only 2 years of experience since he worked only for 2 years or little over 2 years.
Do you think it would help. The company also sent me an email this morning that they would'nt giveme the skillset letter.
Thanks
more...
makeup Justin Bieber som en zombie?
s416504
02-01 03:49 PM
Can you not appeal this denial decision? Appeal result takes more then year & by the time you get 7th year extention as well as You try applying for second labor.
I am completing 6 years in USA by Oct 2010(Current H1 expires). My employer applied for labor in Oct 2007. But it got declined in Dec 10, 2009. My employer is going to file new labor in March, 2010. According to the current labor approvals, Can my labor and 140 gets approved and file for H1B extension before current one expires? If not, what are my option to either extend current H1B or continue to stay and work?
Let me know if you need more information. I am new to this forum.
Quick suggestions are greatly appreciated.
Thanks A Lot,
I am completing 6 years in USA by Oct 2010(Current H1 expires). My employer applied for labor in Oct 2007. But it got declined in Dec 10, 2009. My employer is going to file new labor in March, 2010. According to the current labor approvals, Can my labor and 140 gets approved and file for H1B extension before current one expires? If not, what are my option to either extend current H1B or continue to stay and work?
Let me know if you need more information. I am new to this forum.
Quick suggestions are greatly appreciated.
Thanks A Lot,
girlfriend Zombieland Tallahassee
Saralayar
04-11 11:34 AM
Hey all,
Got a soft LUD on my I140 today (140 was approved on Jul 2006).
EB3 ROW - PD Oct 2005
Jul 2nd AOS filer.
Had some LUD movements after FP's but everything was holding still since 12/18/2007.
It probably means ........ who knows!!!
My assumption is, if it is going to be AOS, then there should be a LUD on I-485. But why just on the approved I-140?. I am curious.:confused:
Got a soft LUD on my I140 today (140 was approved on Jul 2006).
EB3 ROW - PD Oct 2005
Jul 2nd AOS filer.
Had some LUD movements after FP's but everything was holding still since 12/18/2007.
It probably means ........ who knows!!!
My assumption is, if it is going to be AOS, then there should be a LUD on I-485. But why just on the approved I-140?. I am curious.:confused:
hairstyles Chu (Justin Bieber: Never
ebizash
08-13 09:53 AM
Yes, I understand what you mean. I have gone through numerous such anguish...but I have learned to avoid those traps. Yes, when my neighbor who came with a NIIT certificate in 2006 and got 485 approval the first week of August 2008 with a labor substitution, I did feel "fake" "cut the line" and "injustice" words boil inside me. But they didn't matter. When wifey ridicules your MBA from an elite school here, it does not matter. You attain a Buddha like stature.
Life is never fair. Just keep on doing your part and things will fall into place...sooner or later. Mostly later for some of us unfortunates because of these examination rooms, ultrasounds or complete physicals.
Get some sense of humor pleazzz. Don't you notice 2 smilies at the end of my post.... It was in reference to people filing lawsuit because of "cut the line" etc etc...... Anyways I am EB-3 with PD of Jan 2007... so all this does not matter to me..I am anyways not expecting my GC before I go back to India for good.
Life is never fair. Just keep on doing your part and things will fall into place...sooner or later. Mostly later for some of us unfortunates because of these examination rooms, ultrasounds or complete physicals.
Get some sense of humor pleazzz. Don't you notice 2 smilies at the end of my post.... It was in reference to people filing lawsuit because of "cut the line" etc etc...... Anyways I am EB-3 with PD of Jan 2007... so all this does not matter to me..I am anyways not expecting my GC before I go back to India for good.
alterego
08-20 07:15 AM
This is simply logical. I know a lot of conservative republicans may not see it this way just yet but the facts are clear and becoming clearer on this issue. The main point is the case for our immigration issues ought not to be mixed up with something else, ie the issue of the illegals. This guy appears to be one with genuine ideas, across the board on many issues, including the health care behemoth. He is emerging as a flagbearer for the Republicans in 2008.
I was just speaking with some family members in India, some of whom work in the IT field. Their services are so much in demand there that for right now and for the foreseeable future ie atleast in their view the next 5 yrs, they can dictate terms of employment. Employers are going along since the human talent and cost there is an irresistable force and maintaining employee continuity is often very important, plus frankly employers feel India is where they are not restricted by a very restricted labour laws as in Europe and limited talent pool (numbers wise) as in the USA.
The days of crazily high paid blue collar manufacturing jobs are well and truly over. I can remember reading about the high school graduates working the assembly line in unionised auto jobs in Detroit pulling in 6 figure salaries with overtime, and benefits. If anyone believes that this is a myth I can vouch for it having met some of these individuals in my line of work.
If anyone in the US is hoping for those days to return, then they will be waiting for a long time. The place of those jobs will, should and can be taken by these high tech and knowledge jobs in the STEM fields. Once this core of jobs is established the rest of the US economy can thrive by being constructed around this, the US has always been good at the rest of the stuff anyway. Noone can compete with the US in marketing, hollywood glamour, retail, housing, leisure and travel etc etc, but those are not productive enterprises and need to be built on a foundation. The US needs to ensure adequate numbers of individuals whoever they are to get that foundation. If native american kids do it, well and good, otherwise the US has the option of legal immigration, this is not an option open to all countries, they ought to avail themselves of it. Restricting it due to protectionist fears or on account of a broken legal immigration system would be foolish.
I was just speaking with some family members in India, some of whom work in the IT field. Their services are so much in demand there that for right now and for the foreseeable future ie atleast in their view the next 5 yrs, they can dictate terms of employment. Employers are going along since the human talent and cost there is an irresistable force and maintaining employee continuity is often very important, plus frankly employers feel India is where they are not restricted by a very restricted labour laws as in Europe and limited talent pool (numbers wise) as in the USA.
The days of crazily high paid blue collar manufacturing jobs are well and truly over. I can remember reading about the high school graduates working the assembly line in unionised auto jobs in Detroit pulling in 6 figure salaries with overtime, and benefits. If anyone believes that this is a myth I can vouch for it having met some of these individuals in my line of work.
If anyone in the US is hoping for those days to return, then they will be waiting for a long time. The place of those jobs will, should and can be taken by these high tech and knowledge jobs in the STEM fields. Once this core of jobs is established the rest of the US economy can thrive by being constructed around this, the US has always been good at the rest of the stuff anyway. Noone can compete with the US in marketing, hollywood glamour, retail, housing, leisure and travel etc etc, but those are not productive enterprises and need to be built on a foundation. The US needs to ensure adequate numbers of individuals whoever they are to get that foundation. If native american kids do it, well and good, otherwise the US has the option of legal immigration, this is not an option open to all countries, they ought to avail themselves of it. Restricting it due to protectionist fears or on account of a broken legal immigration system would be foolish.
coopheal
09-07 11:22 AM
There is no irony, he is very right. The only injustice with Indians and Chinese is with the comparison to other countries. After all America belongs to its citizens, they come first before the frigging H1b body shops and outsourcing pimps. Personally, am just grateful to have been a student of American economy and Technology consulting (although there is lot one can do to improve there).
For those who want to give me Red, please do so :D. I have two words for you .. the first starts with F and the last ends with U.
I do not know if you understand the meaning of irony.....
The person who names him/herself as BECsufferer is saying that others should not raise their concerns. The fact that his/her IV name has sufferer implies he/she is raising a concern of BEC was taking too long.
If BECsufferer considers gc/citizenship is a privilege then he should not really consider him/herself as sufferer of the process which gets him gc/citizenship.
For those who want to give me Red, please do so :D. I have two words for you .. the first starts with F and the last ends with U.
I do not know if you understand the meaning of irony.....
The person who names him/herself as BECsufferer is saying that others should not raise their concerns. The fact that his/her IV name has sufferer implies he/she is raising a concern of BEC was taking too long.
If BECsufferer considers gc/citizenship is a privilege then he should not really consider him/herself as sufferer of the process which gets him gc/citizenship.
No comments:
Post a Comment